In today’s employment environment everyone is fighting to be the best and stand out from the crowd when it comes to getting that next career break no matter how big or small. Maybe it’s a voluntary move with no pressure from where you are currently and you’re able to browse the market to find the shoe that fits and make it work best for you when it comes to flexibility, location and ‘perks of the job’. Or you mite be one of the many folk who are in the unfortunate position of having to jump from a sinking ship either voluntarily or with a little nudge.
![]()
In this environment it seems to becoming an ever popular choice to not only apply for new jobs, contact recruiters in the chosen fields and to keep in touch with old friends elsewhere within industry but to also keep the CV equivalent of Facebook up to date. LinkedIn.
LinkedIn is a great tool to offer the professional ‘you’ to business acquaintances and enable you to keep that professional distance with clients, colleagues as well as past, present and hopefully future employers.
In the cut throat world of job hunting and recruitment are we becoming too at ease with the information we divulge when it comes to our skills and experience on our online ‘CV’s'?
VISA and MasterCard are alerting banks across the country about a recent major breach at a U.S.-based credit card processor. Sources in the financial sector are calling the breach “massive,” and say it may involve more than 10 million compromised card numbers.
Update, 4:32 p.m. ET: Atlanta-based processor Global Payments just confirmed that they discovered a breach in early March 2012. See their full statement and several other updates at the end of this story.
Original post:
In separate non-public alerts sent late last week, VISA and MasterCard began warning banks about specific cards that may have been compromised. The card associations stated that the breached credit card processor was compromised between Jan. 21, 2012 and Feb. 25, 2012. The alerts also said that full Track 1 and Track 2 data was taken – meaning that the information could be used to counterfeit new cards.
Neither VISA nor MasterCard have said which U.S.-based processor was the source of the breach. But affected banks are now starting to analyze transaction data on the compromised cards, in hopes of finding a common point of purchase. Sources at two different major financial institutions said the transactions that most of the cards they analyzed seem to have in common are that they were used in parking garages in and around the New York City area.
It’s not clear how many cards were breached in the processor attack, but a sampling from one corner of the industry provides some perspective. On Wednesday, PSCU — a provider of online financial services to credit unions — said it alerted 482 credit unions that appear to have had cards impacted by the breach, and that a total of 56,455 member VISA and MasterCard accounts were compromised. PSCU said fraudulent activity had been detected on a relatively small number of those cards — 876 accounts — and that the activity was geographically dispersed.
It’s hard to believe, but it’s time again for another installment of Verizon’s annual Data Breach Investigations Report. This year’s report represents our largest dataset ever, with 855 confirmed security breaches accounting for a combined 174 million compromised records. As always, we analyze the data and attempt to explain what happened, who did it and who was affected. We are very pleased to announce that the 2012 DBIR again includes data provided by our valued collaborators, the U.S. Secret Service and the Dutch High Tech Crime Unit. We are even more pleased to announce that these agencies are joined this year by the Irish Reporting and Information Security Service, the Australian Federal Police, and the Police Central e-Crime Unit of the London Metropolitan Police.. The inclusion of data provided by these agencies allows for the most geographically diverse DBIR to date.
As someone who has worked with many trainees, work placements and apprenticeships over the years it still surprises’ me the lack of enthusiasm some within the IT community have when it comes to taking someone trying to enter the industry under their wing. Whether it be for a day a week or upto two years when it comes to level 3 apprenticeships.
Everyone of us across the IT field had to start somewhere. Either through self study and getting that initial break in the industry to build upwards and onwards or through the many academic university and college pathways to get that all important ‘piece of paper’ after which they can then learn how it’s actually done for real in everyday industry life with the pressure of time, budget and political constraints which cannot be rein-acted in the classroom.
Speaking from my own observations and conversations with others within the community it seems there is a lack of motivation to firstly attract fresh blood to a point where they are interested in even a one week placement during high school and should that decision to take on a work placement be out of their control and is pushed through by management there seems to be a bigger feeling of it being some kind of punishment. Trying all possible options to avoid having a side-kick for a few days and then once the newly acquired side kick has arrived and management have finished the introductions quickly pointing said ‘side-kick’ in the direction of a task which will keep them quite and out of the way of ’mentor’ for the day mindlessly imaging PC after PC with no real input from said ‘mentor’ about what and why they are actually doing.
Can anyone else relate to this?
Why is it that between 25% and 50% of people report feeling overwhelmed or burned out at work?
It’s not just the number of hours we’re working, but also the fact that we spend too many continuous hours juggling too many things at the same time.
What we’ve lost, above all, are stopping points, finish lines and boundaries. Technology has blurred them beyond recognition. Wherever we go, our work follows us, on our digital devices, ever insistent and intrusive. It’s like an itch we can’t resist scratching, even though scratching invariably makes it worse.
Tell the truth: Do you answer email during conference calls (and sometimes even during calls with one other person)? Do you bring your laptop to meetings and then pretend you’re taking notes while you surf the net? Do you eat lunch at your desk? Do you make calls while you’re driving, and even send the occasional text, even though you know you shouldn’t?
The biggest cost — assuming you don’t crash — is to your productivity. In part, that’s a simple consequence of splitting your attention, so that you’re partially engaged in multiple activities but rarely fully engaged in any one. In part, it’s because when you switch away from a primary task to do something else, you’re increasing the time it takes to finish that task by an average of 25 per cent.